Antitrust+?
Given my post last night, this will probably sound like piling on. But I’m sorry, it’s the first thing that comes to mind. I don’t see how it can’t.
How on Earth is Google going to avoid antitrust inquiries with their new Search+ features announced today? If Facebook, Twitter, etc, have any decent presence in DC, the ball began rolling a few hours ago.
This is the type of case that Senators die for. Google wrapped it in a bow and placed it in one of their laps.
Most of the broader antitrust concerns against Google are bullshit in my opinion. You can argue that they have a monopoly on search, but it’s a natural one. They’ve earned it. They’re simply better at search than their competitors. This has always been true. It remains true.
But when they use that natural monopoly to start pushing into other verticals, things get gray. Travel, restaurant reviews, etc, etc. We see more of it each year.
Source: parislemon
The Key Difference Between Apple And Amazon Will Be Seen Next Quarter
Amazon is predicting record Kindle sales next quarter, just as Apple is predicting record iPhone and iPad sales next quarter. But there’s one key difference.
As a result of those record sales, Apple could see a $40 billion quarter in terms of revenue — that will undoubtedly lead to record profit. Meanwhile, Amazon, even with record sales, is warning that their numbers could dip. They may even lose money next quarter. Possibly a lot of money.
Apple is going to set records for their two most financially successful products. Amazon is going to set a record for a product that they may actually lose money selling.
Apple and Amazon play in the same general space now, but they play in that space in the exact opposite way of one another.
Apple’s model clearly works in this space. Amazon’s model? We’ll see. Remember, they’ll be competing with Apple on the price of much of their digital content as well.
The ability to upsell Amazon Prime may end up being the key here…
Update: And a good follow-up tweet from Michael DeGusta:
…and next quarter Apple will actually report their iPhone/iPad sales while Amazon will not report their Kindle sales.
Amazon has never reported actual Kindle sales numbers in their earnings statements. It’s very odd. They always talk about setting sales records, but they refuse to back those claims up with any actual data. It’s like bragging you’re the best at something but when asked why that’s the case, you respond with “just because”.
Maybe Amazon will change this odd trend and actually report tangible numbers in the holiday quarter.
Update 2: As a few have pointed out, the wording in The Next Web’s post is a bit confusing. They talk about decreases in revenue, but it would seem they actually mean net income (with revenue growth not quite lining up with record sales growth). I’ve tweaked my wording to make this more clear.
As always, profit is the key here — it’s the money you get to keep. Again, with their record revenue, Apple will undoubtedly also see record profit. But with their own massive revenue, Amazon may actually lose money next quarter. Their release indicates that Q4 income could be anywhere from a $250 million gain to a $200 million loss! Think about that for a second. That’s pretty crazy.
Source: parislemon
This huge chart of big-money mergers goes with today’s Report on Business story:
Mergers are back in a big wayAfter a slow start to 2010, the market for mergers is rolling, with conditions that remind bankers of the golden years of the mid-2000s. The underpinnings for recovery began to line up in summer, after the European sovereign debt scare faded, with cheap and plentiful financing and signs of an improving economy.
In all, even without the Potash transaction, 2010 mergers and acquisitions totalled $177-billion (U.S.), according to Thomson Reuters, up from $146-billion in 2009.
Source: globeandmail
Source: leilockheart
OK THESE ARE OFFICIALLY THE COOLEST THINGS IVE EVER SEEN!
